Skip to content
Wiki
HOME / JURISDICTIONS / South Korea
Jurisdictional snapshot · APAC
Updated 2026-07-30

South Korea

User-protection-first regime under VAUPA in force since July 2024; the Digital Asset Basic Act returns to the National Assembly in September 2026 with the bank-consortium 51 per cent rule as the stall point, while the BoK CBDC programme moves to real-transaction testing with 9 banks on the same September calendar.

Catch up on South Korea→

Recent developments

13 on file

Key institutions

Fss KoreaShinhanWooriMirae Asset SecuritiesKrxDunamu

South Korea is running a deliberately two-phase build-out: VAUPA (Virtual Asset User Protection Act) in force since July 2024 covers user protection and unfair-trading rules, while the Digital Asset Basic Act (DABA) carrying institutional access, stablecoin issuance frameworks and broader market structure is still in legislative progress. The April 2026 confirmation of Hyun Song Shin as Bank of Korea Governor, after a decade as Head of the BIS Monetary and Economic Department, puts the framer of the unified-ledger and tokenised-deposit architecture into the chair of one of the operators inside it. Against Japan's 3 named PSA stablecoin routes and Hong Kong's stretched Stablecoins Ordinance perimeter, Korea has chosen a narrower sequencing where retail safeguards land first and the institutional surface follows.

Regulatory posture

FSC Korea is the lead rulemaker, FSS Korea handles day-to-day supervision of registered virtual-asset service providers, Bank of Korea owns wholesale settlement and CBDC, and the Ministry of Economy and Finance sits over tax and macro framing. The split is closer to the HK model than to Japan's single-supervisor-plus-sandbox model.

VAUPA Phase 1 is the operational regime today: segregation of customer assets, custody and insurance requirements at the exchange level, real-name banking-account access, and a market-manipulation framework with criminal penalties. The shape reflects post-Terra political reality, with institutional access and stablecoin issuance held back until the user-protection floor was in place.

DABA Phase 2 carries the harder design questions: which entities can issue a won-pegged stablecoin, what reserve and redemption rules apply, and how institutional accounts are unlocked. The open question for stablecoin readers is whether KRW issuance gets channelled through banks, trust companies, a fund-transfer-style licence, or some combination; none of that is settled.

Active pilots

  • BoK CBDC programme. The second phase moves to real-transaction testing in September 2026 with 9 banks, including KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Hana and Woori, on an architecture where the central bank provides the institutional-CBDC layer and each bank issues its own deposit tokens on top (CoinDesk). The design tracks Hyun Song Shin's unified-ledger framing (see BIS unified-ledger blueprint) and pre-builds the bank-centred architecture the BoK wants DABA to codify.
  • Project Agorá. Korean participation as a watch item; whether the Korean won leg is in scope is one of the more pointed open questions for cross-border readers.
  • KRW stablecoin policy direction. Won-pegged issuance by non-banks remains blocked pending DABA. Two bank-led consortia have formed to position for whatever the statute permits: a principal 8-bank consortium coordinated by the Open Blockchain & DID Association under FSS oversight, and a second grouping around Hana, BNK and iM Bank. See Korea won-stablecoin consortium.
  • Tokenised-securities statutory wedge. The National Assembly passed amendments to the Capital Markets Act and the Electronic Securities Act on 15 January 2026, recognising distributed-ledger records as valid securities registration and letting tokenised debt, equity, and investment-contract products trade through brokerages, effective January 2027 after a one-year preparation period (Coinspeaker). Mirae Asset Securities is the furthest along domestically: a joint token-securities mainnet with Hana Financial Group and SK Telecom, Asia's first cross-border digital bond by a financial institution (100bn won across HKD and USD tranches), and the sole Korean financial company in the DTCC tokenisation working group.
  • Institutional access. Corporate accounts at registered exchanges and broader institutional participation are gating items inside DABA Phase 2 rather than VAUPA Phase 1.

Open questions

  • Whether the September 2026 DABA text preserves the 51 per cent bank-consortium rule or admits non-bank issuers.
  • Whether the BoK's September phase 2 defines interoperability between the 9 banks' deposit tokens, and how the design maps onto DABA's stablecoin architecture.
  • Whether Project Agorá includes a Korean won leg, and how that interacts with any DABA stablecoin perimeter.
  • Whether DABA's institutional-access provisions accommodate AI agents holding tokenised won, or whether VAUPA's user-protection-first framing forecloses that surface by default.

Related