Skip to content
HOME / NEWS / SYNTHESIS
News
Commentary

Standard Chartered: Stablecoins Could Complete Tokenisation's Missing Cash Leg


Key points

  • Waqar Chaudry, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets, Financing and Securities Services, published the piece on 23 September 2026.
  • The core argument is that tokenising only the asset side of a transaction leaves the cash leg dependent on off-chain confirmations, pre-positioned cash and cross-system reconciliation, and regulated stablecoins could close that gap through coordinated delivery-versus-payment.
  • Chaudry identifies tokenised fund subscriptions and redemptions as one of the clearest early examples, where stablecoins could link funding, unit issuance, custody and record-keeping into a single digital workflow.
  • The piece explicitly rejects a binary future: rather than stablecoins displacing commercial bank money or central bank money, it anticipates a multi-money environment with trusted conversion between different regulated digital money forms.
  • Liquidity, pricing, investor protection and legal settlement finality are all listed as needing to mature alongside the technology, signalling that Standard Chartered views the infrastructure as incomplete rather than ready to operate at scale.

Standard Chartered‘s head of Digital Assets, Financing and Securities Services, Waqar Chaudry, argues that the first phase of tokenisation demonstrated digital issuance and transfer, but left a structural gap: the money leg still runs on conventional timetables, banking windows and reconciliation queues. Stablecoins, on this reading, matter not because they move value faster in isolation, but because they can make cash available on the same networks and within the same workflows as the investment asset itself, enabling coordinated delivery-versus-payment rather than a sequence of disconnected confirmations.

Chaudry is careful to scope what “24/7” actually means in institutional markets. Continuous order submission, settlement, secondary trading, fund subscriptions and redemptions, and fiat conversion are distinct capabilities that will develop at different speeds. A credible market model, he argues, must specify which service is continuously available, at what price, with what liquidity and under which legal controls, rather than treating round-the-clock access as a single switch to flip.

Tokenised funds receive particular attention as an early use case. In a stablecoin-enabled workflow, eligible investors could move through funding, unit issuance, custody and record-keeping as one controlled digital process, with redemption reversing those steps and proceeds delivered in an accepted form of digital money. The piece stops well short of claiming stablecoins will displace commercial bank money or central bank money; the likelier outcome it describes is a multi-money environment in which different regulated digital money forms serve different networks and risk requirements, with trusted conversion between them. Liquidity, pricing, investor protection and legal settlement finality are all flagged as needing to develop alongside the technology, which keeps this firmly in the domain of strategic positioning rather than an announcement of any live product or infrastructure.