IMF warns tokenisation removes shock absorbers alongside settlement friction
Key points
- The IMF's Global Financial Stability Report includes a dedicated chapter on tokenisation, concluding that removing market intermediaries and settlement delays also removes shock-absorbing buffers that slow crisis transmission.
- The Fund currently assesses systemic risk from tokenisation as low, primarily because the market remains too small to matter at a macro-prudential level.
- Proven benefits identified include lower issuance costs, reduced reconciliation, and delivery-versus-payment settlement; automated margining and real-time supervisory reporting are listed as aspirations rather than achievements.
- Early data cited in the report shows more than half of tokenised equity trades occur outside US market hours and approximately 80% involve less than one share, pointing to demand from market segments underserved by conventional infrastructure.
- The IMF cautions that many efficiency claims for tokenisation are achievable through conventional digitisation, citing India's same-day equity settlement as an example, and locates tokenisation's genuine distinctiveness in combining assets, money, and automated rules on one shared platform.
The International Monetary Fund’s latest Global Financial Stability Report dedicates a full chapter to tokenisation, reaching a conclusion that will give pause to proponents: the delays and intermediaries that make traditional markets slow and expensive also function as buffers that slow the spread of stress. Eliminating them accelerates settlement but may equally accelerate contagion. The Fund stops short of sounding an alarm, noting that tokenised markets remain too small to pose systemic risk at present.
On the benefit side, the IMF draws a careful line between what is already demonstrable and what is still aspirational. Cheaper issuance, reduced reconciliation overhead, and atomic settlement of cash against securities are visible in live markets. The Fund cites early data as evidence of genuine demand for tokenisation’s distinct features: more than half of tokenised equity trading occurs outside US market hours, and roughly 80% of trades involve less than one share, both patterns that conventional markets do not serve well. Automated margining and real-time supervisory reporting, by contrast, remain unrealised.
Perhaps the sharpest observation in the chapter is a methodological one. Many of the efficiency gains attributed to tokenisation are, in the IMF’s reading, actually products of digitisation more broadly and reachable without distributed ledger technology. India’s same-day settlement for certain equities is offered as an illustration. What tokenisation distinctively adds, on this framing, is the co-location of assets, money, and programmable rules on a single shared platform, a narrower but still meaningful claim than the industry typically makes.
More on the wire
- ESMA launches call for evidence on tokenised collateral in central clearing
- ESMA Opens Consultation on Whether Tokenised Collateral Meets CCP Safety Standards
- XRP Ledger activates PermissionDelegationV1_1, splitting operational and compliance keys for institutions
- Citrini says fee-earning platforms may outperform bitcoin and ether in tokenisation wave