Skip to content
News
ProposalUnited States

Fed Proposes Stablecoin Rules With Lenient Reserve Caps But Strict Capital Requirements


Key points

  • The Federal Reserve is the third US federal regulator to publish proposed stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act, following the OCC and the FDIC.
  • The Fed's framework covers stablecoin subsidiaries of state-chartered Federal Reserve member banks and uninsured state-chartered depository institutions, including Wyoming special-purpose banks, once issuance exceeds $10 billion.
  • Unlike the OCC's 40% single-institution cap, 10% minimum in bank or Fed accounts, and 20-day average maturity limit, the Fed proposes no equivalent numerical reserve diversification constraints.
  • The Fed's reserve rules require only that holdings be diversified enough to maintain full backing under stress and that composition be "predominantly" Treasuries, with specific figures left to consultation.
  • On capital requirements the Fed is the most prescriptive of the three regulators, creating an asymmetric regime where reserve flexibility is offset by stricter capital treatment.

The Federal Reserve has released its proposed stablecoin oversight framework under the GENIUS Act, becoming the third federal regulator to do so after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The proposal applies to a narrower population than those of its peers: stablecoin subsidiaries of state-chartered banks that are Federal Reserve System members, plus uninsured state-chartered depository institutions such as Wyoming’s special-purpose banks, once their issuance crosses $10 billion. Most major issuers currently hold state or national trust charters and therefore fall under OCC jurisdiction, not the Fed’s.

On reserves, the Fed’s proposal is markedly less prescriptive than its counterparts. The OCC and FDIC each proposed capping reserves held at any single financial institution at 40%, and the OCC further required that at least 10% be held in bank or Fed accounts alongside a 20-day average maturity ceiling. The Fed proposes none of those numerical constraints. Its reserve rules ask issuers to diversify sufficiently to remain fully backed under stress conditions, describe reserve composition as “predominantly” Treasuries, and leave the precise parameters open to consultation responses.

Where the Fed breaks from leniency is on capital, where it takes the most prescriptive stance among the three regulators. The practical effect for operators is a bifurcated compliance landscape: charter type and issuance scale determine which rulebook applies, and the Fed’s version will be largely irrelevant to today’s largest issuers unless their structure or scale changes. Whether the consultation phase narrows the Fed’s currently open-ended reserve language is the critical variable to watch as the rulemaking progresses.

Original source

Ledger Insights

ledgerinsights.com