Fed Analysis Maps How SVB Collapse Forced Circle to Overhaul USDC Reserves
Key points
- Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Boston published an analysis of Circle's USDC reserve restructuring following Silicon Valley Bank's March 2023 failure, during which Circle had $3.3 billion deposited at SVB.
- The weighted average maturity of the Circle Reserve Fund fell from above the money market fund median to among the shortest of any Treasury-only money market fund after the SVB collapse.
- Reverse repurchase agreement holdings rose from zero to over 90% of net assets before settling at 69%, with centrally cleared sponsored repos reaching 77% of that book by Q4 2025.
- Bank deposit counterparties shifted toward GSIBs while cash declined from 20–25% of total reserves pre-SVB to 12–15% since 2024.
- The Fed researchers' detailed scrutiny of a single issuer's reserve mechanics suggests stablecoin reserve composition is now firmly within the central bank's analytical, and likely supervisory, frame of reference.
Researchers from the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Boston have published a post-mortem examining how Circle restructured the reserve assets backing USDC after Silicon Valley Bank failed in March 2023. Circle had $3.3 billion deposited at SVB at the time, a concentration that triggered a de-peg of the stablecoin and exposed the fragility of its then-prevailing reserve strategy.
The Federal Reserve analysis identifies four distinct shifts in how Circle now holds reserves. The weighted average maturity of the Circle Reserve Fund dropped sharply, falling from above the median for money market funds to among the shortest of any Treasury-only money market fund, reducing interest rate risk in the process. Reverse repurchase agreements, which had been absent from the portfolio, surged to over 90% of net assets before stabilising at 69%. Within that repo book, centrally cleared sponsored repos grew to represent 77% of holdings by the fourth quarter of 2025.
Bank deposits moved in two directions simultaneously: the counterparty mix shifted toward global systemically important banks (GSIBs), while cash as a share of total reserves contracted from a pre-SVB range of 20% to 25% down to between 12% and 15% since 2024. Taken together, the changes suggest Circle traded yield and flexibility for shorter duration, higher-quality collateral, and more systemically protected counterparties. For stablecoin operators and their institutional partners, the Fed’s willingness to publish this level of reserve granularity signals that reserve composition will remain a live regulatory focus.
More on the wire
- Citi Plans Bitcoin Custody Service for Institutional Clients Later This Year
- Citi Plans Crypto Custody Launch This Year, Starting With Bitcoin
- U.S. Accounting Standards Group Proposes Stablecoins as Cash Equivalents
- US Treasury Proposes GENIUS Act Rules Defining Payment Stablecoin Issuance Jurisdiction