EU Parliament backs stablecoin multi-issuance, rejecting ESRB ban stance
Key points
- The European Parliament adopted a digital assets report on 9 July 2026, passing it 390 votes to 86, with its most consequential position supporting stablecoin multi-issuance.
- Parliament's stance directly contradicts the ESRB, which recommended in September 2025 that the Commission rule multi-issuance impermissible under MiCA.
- Circle's USDC already operates under a multi-issuance model, issued via a US entity and a French MiCA-authorised entity, with tokens interchangeable and reserves split by jurisdiction.
- France's ACPR asked the Commission in 2024 to confirm that MiCA's preamble references to multi-issuance and proportionate reserves apply to e-money tokens; no definitive ruling has followed.
- The report is non-binding, but the Commission's MiCA review consultation runs until 30 September and a legislative proposal is widely expected in 2027, making Parliament's wording a meaningful signal for what binding law may contain.
The European Parliament has adopted a digital assets report by 390 votes to 86, taking a clear position in favour of stablecoin multi-issuance: the arrangement where a single token is issued by both an EU and a non-EU entity, with reserves split across jurisdictions. Parliament wants the practice placed on a firm legal footing with appropriate safeguards, a stance that directly contradicts the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), which recommended last September that the Commission rule the practice incompatible with the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation.
Multi-issuance is already the operating model for the largest MiCA-compliant stablecoins. Circle issues USDC through its US entity and separately through a French entity under MiCA, with the two tokens fully interchangeable and reserves allocated between the two jurisdictions. France’s Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (ACPR), Circle’s French regulator, raised the question with the Commission in 2024, noting that MiCA’s preamble does reference multi-issuance and proportionate reserve allocation. In the absence of a definitive Commission ruling, national regulators have reached their own conclusions, producing exactly the kind of fragmented legal landscape MiCA was designed to eliminate.
The report is a non-binding own-initiative document, carrying no direct legal force. That caveat matters less than it might appear: Parliament uses such reports to establish its negotiating position ahead of binding legislation, and the language tends to resurface when formal proposals arrive. The timing reinforces this reading. The Commission is consulting on a MiCA review through 30 September, and a legislative proposal is widely anticipated in 2027. The Parliament’s endorsement of multi-issuance makes it considerably harder for the Commission to adopt the ESRB’s restrictive interpretation without a political fight.
More on the wire
- Eight more banks join China's e-CNY network as 2026 roster triples
- HSBC and Standard Chartered complete first live tokenised deposit transfer over Swift blockchain
- Citi Plans Bitcoin Custody Service for Institutional Clients Later This Year
- Citi Plans Crypto Custody Launch This Year, Starting With Bitcoin