Skip to content
News
PilotUnited Kingdom

Bank of England, MAS and Bank of Thailand Complete PvP Synchronisation Trial


Key points

  • Project Meridian FX APAC, involving the Bank of England, MAS, and the Bank of Thailand, has completed and confirmed that synchronisation can coordinate atomic PvP FX settlement across heterogeneous central bank systems.
  • The Bank of England's RT2 system supported direct earmarking by the synchronisation operator, allowing it to fulfil a lightweight, non-custodial role without modification.
  • Thailand's Project SAN used an internal escrow to reserve funds but did not transfer custody to the operator, keeping it broadly within the intended non-custodial model.
  • MAS's SGD Testnet for wholesale CBDC lacked native earmarking support, forcing Partior to operate a dedicated escrow account and temporarily take custody of participant funds, raising custodial, credit, and insolvency concerns.
  • The trial establishes that the operator's functional scope is not fixed by design intent but is instead bounded by the technical capabilities of each central bank's settlement infrastructure.

Project Meridian FX APAC, a joint trial involving the Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and the Bank of Thailand, has concluded after testing whether a synchronisation operator could coordinate atomic payment-versus-payment (PvP) foreign exchange settlements across three structurally different central bank wholesale systems. The experiment confirmed that synchronisation as a mechanism works. However, it also exposed a consequential asymmetry: the degree to which the operator could remain lightweight and non-custodial depended almost entirely on what each underlying system was built to support.

The Bank of England’s RT2 environment was the cleanest case. Built with interoperability in mind, it allowed the operator to earmark funds directly, requiring no architectural workarounds. Thailand’s Project SAN used an internal escrow arrangement to reserve funds, but custody did not pass to the operator, so it remained within the spirit of the non-custodial model. MAS’s SGD Testnet for wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) presented the starkest challenge: because it did not support operator-side earmarking on behalf of participants, Partior was required to run a dedicated escrow account and temporarily hold custody of funds, inverting the non-custodial premise entirely.

That inversion is the operative finding for anyone building toward multi-jurisdiction PvP infrastructure. Where a system lacks native earmarking capability, the synchronisation operator is pulled into a custodial role that introduces credit exposure and insolvency risk, concerns that central banks have been explicit about wanting to design away. The trial’s honest accounting of these gaps, rather than smoothing them over, makes the results more useful as an engineering and policy reference than a cleaner headline would have been.

Original source

Ledger Insights

ledgerinsights.com